<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
    
    <channel>
    
    <title>Eighth Day Books Discussions</title>
    <link>http://forums.edbforums.com/</link>
    <description>Eighth Day Books Discussions</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2007</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2007-10-08T07:36:56-06:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>A novel&#8217;s ultimate fulfillment in film&#63;&#160;</title>
      <link>http://forums.edbforums.com/viewthread/7/</link>
      <guid>http://forums.edbforums.com/viewthread/7/#When:22:36:59Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I should be more prepared before posting, but I wanted to ask a question anyway while I was thinking it over.&#160; I subscribe to Mars Hill Audio and on one of the last two CDs I heard a guest say something to the effect of &#8220;a novel finds its ultimate fulfillment in a movie,&#8221; while discussing books that are made into movies.&#160; I found that idea fascinating; the guest also likened this idea to the Incarnation, I believe.&#160; Give me a day or two and I will figure out which CD this guest was on and if I even have the quote correct, but what do y&#8217;all think about this idea?
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2006-02-26T22:36:59-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>cinema as the new, all&#45;inclusive art form&#63;&#160;</title>
      <link>http://forums.edbforums.com/viewthread/4/</link>
      <guid>http://forums.edbforums.com/viewthread/4/#When:14:55:17Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I attended Barbara Nicolosi&#8217;s book signing and presentation this past Monday (thank you Dell, for organizing, and Warren for hosting).&#160; As is my usual habit when listening to a good speaker who has a lot of articulate, thoughtful points to make, I found myself nodding in agreement to most of the ideas she presented.&#160; Now, on more careful reflection, I still can&#8217;t say that I have found reason to definitely disagree with her on any points, but maybe I have just come around to some healthy skepticism.&#160; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
First of all, I was almost floored by what she said about cinema being the new art form that is a composite of the old ones (in that it consists of dramatization, text/dialogue, music, and visual imagery).&#160; I thought, &#8220;Yea, of course!&#8221;  But it almost seems like too grand a claim to be justifiable.&#160; Is it possible that cinema includes all these features, but does so only minimally, so that instead of having the potential for becoming a great, all&#45;inclusive new artistic medium, cinema might actually be guilty of taking, and in some way cheapening, the defining features of the traditional media?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Text, for instance, in cinema becomes mostly just dialogue (with the rare monologue, or the narrative &#8220;over voice&quot;).&#160; But isn&#8217;t there something in the experience of the written art forms that demands a printed text?&#160; The movie portrays everything directly to the senses of sight and hearing, whereas the written word portrays nothing to the senses, but relies upon the reader&#8217;s imagination to conjure all that the words evoke.&#160; That&#45;&#45;the provocation of the audience&#8217;s imagination&#45;&#45;seems to be what the movie medium leaves out, and if that&#8217;s the case, it&#8217;s a pretty huge omission.&#160; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I&#8217;m not sure of any of this, but like I said, just fearing that it might be the case.&#160; If anyone can set me straight&#45;&#45;disabuse me of my skepticism&#45;&#45;I&#8217;d be grateful.&#160; I would really like to believe that cinema has the potential to be a vehicle for our artistic Renaissance, but...it could be wishful thinking.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Jessica
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2006-02-15T14:55:17-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Thank You, EDB!&#160;</title>
      <link>http://forums.edbforums.com/viewthread/3/</link>
      <guid>http://forums.edbforums.com/viewthread/3/#When:11:50:08Z</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, Warren et al for putting together this forum!&#160; I am from Wichita and love the store, but we live in Milwaukee now (attending Marquette) and are away from the &#8220;happenings&#8221; at home.&#160; May we all be blessed in this endeavor, and may we be a blessing to each other.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
BTW &#45; EDB is known and well liked at Marquette, and some catalogues have strategically &#8220;appeared&#8221; around the Theology Dept since we came back from our holiday trip home&#8230; &lt;img src=&quot;http://edbforums.com/images/smileys/wink.gif&quot; width=&quot;19&quot; height=&quot;19&quot; alt=&quot;wink&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <dc:date>2006-02-08T11:50:08-06:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>